Who is it for?
For SaaS companies, software houses and IT providers that receive security questionnaires, vendor qualification forms, due diligence requests or similar customer questionnaires requiring input from several parts of the business.
First product
The first step is a paid pilot based on one real questionnaire. It is not a subscription app, a full GRC system, a cybersecurity audit or a full compliance service.
Confidentiality
During the first call, we only determine whether the pilot makes sense and how further work should be organized safely. Questionnaires, policies and customer data should not be sent through the contact form.
Support for preparing responses to security questionnaires and due diligence
We help SaaS companies and IT providers prepare responses to forms required by larger customers, including security questionnaires, vendor onboarding, privacy, business continuity and due diligence. We organize previous answers, source documents, missing information and issues requiring approval.
This usually concerns security questionnaires, vendor onboarding forms, due diligence packs, privacy questionnaires and similar qualification forms that delay sales, onboarding or contract signing.
Do not send questionnaires, policies, customer data or other confidential information through the contact form at this stage.
Vendor security questionnaire and due diligence questionnaire
This service makes sense mainly when questionnaires appear regularly, require input from several people or create a real delay in sales, onboarding or contract closure.
- SaaS companies,
- software houses,
- IT service providers,
- technology integrators,
- hosting and managed services companies.
Why does every new questionnaire involve several people again?
Answers are scattered
Previous responses live in spreadsheets, documents, email threads and private notes.
Current status is unclear
No one is fully sure whether a specific answer is still accurate and aligned with the current control environment.
Sales waits for experts
The commercial team waits for the CTO, security owner, DPO, legal counsel or continuity lead.
The same work starts from zero
Similar questionnaires are rebuilt from scratch because there is no structured library of approved answers.
Evidence is missing
Answers are not connected to policies, procedures, confirmations or other source materials that actually support them.
Gaps appear at the end
Contradictions and missing data are discovered only during the final review, when the response deadline is already close.
Responses based on approved documents and evidence
Questionnaire → questions → previous answers → source documents → gaps → responsible people → drafts → review → approval → export → answer library
- The questionnaire is captured in one place instead of moving across inboxes and chats.
- Questions are broken down into smaller topics so it becomes clear which ones can rely on previous materials.
- We look for previous answers that can be reused or serve as a starting point for an update.
- Source documents, decisions or other confirmations are attached only when they actually exist.
- Missing information is marked explicitly instead of being hidden in internal comments.
- Each question that needs a decision is assigned to the right responsible person.
- Draft responses are prepared, but they are not treated as final without review.
- The review checks consistency between the answer, its source and any declared gaps.
- Final approval remains with a human on the client side, not with Elistar or AI.
- Only approved content is prepared for export into the customer-facing form.
- Approved responses can then feed a structured answer library for future questionnaires.
Support for preparation, not automatic approval
A system or AI may help find materials and draft responses, but missing sources must be marked explicitly and missing information cannot be invented.
What is delivered during the pilot?
- a structured list of questions and statuses,
- a response draft for one real questionnaire,
- references to previous answers,
- links between answers and source documents,
- a list of questions requiring expert confirmation,
- a list of missing policies, documents or decisions,
- a set of responses approved during the pilot,
- a summary of effort and possible next improvements.
We start with one real questionnaire
- Short qualification call We review the questionnaire type, frequency, available materials and any data security constraints.
- Agreement on a safe working model We agree on scope, responsibilities, transfer method, data retention and the people responsible for approvals.
- Paid pilot We work on one real questionnaire and measure effort, coverage from existing knowledge, the number of gaps and the expert workload involved.
When might a simpler approach be enough?
- the company receives only a few short questionnaires per year,
- one person can prepare the response in a few hours,
- previous answers are current and well controlled,
- the company already uses an effective questionnaire automation or proposal management tool,
- the issue does not delay sales or onboarding.
What cannot be confirmed automatically on behalf of the company?
- Elistar helps prepare, structure and coordinate responses.
- Final approval of the truthfulness of each response remains with the client.
- The service is not a cybersecurity audit.
- The service is not a certification.
- The service is not legal advice.
- Elistar does not confirm compliance without approved evidence.
- Missing policies, procedures or controls are marked as gaps.
- Responses are not sent automatically to the end customer.
Do you have a security questionnaire or due diligence form to complete?
During a short call, we will determine whether a one-questionnaire pilot is justified, what materials are available and which answers require confirmation. Do not send documents or confidential information through the contact form at this stage.
Do not send questionnaires, policies, customer data or other confidential information through the contact form at this stage.
