Who is it for?

For HVAC, renewable energy, installation and technical field service companies, and for the people responsible for service quality, timeliness and visibility.

Which workflow do we organise?

One service workflow: from request intake through ownership, deadline, priority and documentation to billing readiness and confirmed closure.

How can you start?

There are two real entry points: a free scanner for initial self-assessment or a paid one-workflow audit when the problem is already clear.

Building ServiceOps

HVAC Service Management System for Requests and Maintenance

We help HVAC, renewable energy, installation and technical service companies organise one service workflow: from request intake, ownership and scheduling to documentation, billing readiness and confirmed closure.

This is for the owner, service manager, coordinator or dispatcher who wants to see backlog, exceptions and responsibility without asking people for the current status of every case.

A system for HVAC service requests, maintenance and warranties

  • for HVAC, air conditioning, ventilation and heat recovery companies,
  • for renewable energy companies: heat pumps, photovoltaics and energy storage,
  • for installation companies handling requests, warranties and inspections,
  • for technical field service teams with in-house technicians or subcontractors,
  • for the owner, service manager, coordinator or dispatcher and the person responsible for service quality and timeliness.

What does the process look like before it is organised?

Requests come from many places

Phone calls, email and chat tools create several parallel case lists.

Statuses live in spreadsheets or memory

The manager and customer ask people for updates because there is no single current view.

There is no clear owner

It is unclear who should take the next step and who owns the deadline.

Photos and reports are outside the case

Proof of work is scattered across the technician’s phone, email and folders.

Deadlines and priorities are unclear

It is hard to distinguish what needs fast action from what is still waiting for data or a decision.

Billing closes too late

There is no single “ready for billing” point and no formal closure conditions.

From request intake to verification and case closure

Each case has a number, status, owner and next step. The customer, site and device are tied to the case, deadlines and priorities are visible, and photos, reports and documents stay inside the same workflow.

  • the coordinator can see gaps, delays and overdue cases,
  • it becomes clear when a case is ready for billing,
  • closure requires defined conditions instead of only someone saying “done”,
  • the manager can see backlog and exceptions without manually collecting status updates from the team.

The scope is not fixed in advance

After analysing the workflow, we choose only the scope that makes sense for that process. Not every pilot needs every status, document, role and integration at once.

Two ways to begin

Not sure where to start?

Complete the free scanner to identify areas where service processes most often lose information, ownership or time.

Run the service process scanner ➜

First paid step

Audit of one service workflow

When the problem is already clear, we can analyse one real workflow — for example fault handling, complaints, inspections, warranty repairs or service order billing.

See the audit scope ➜

Technicians, subcontractors, reports and service documentation

Intake and qualification

The case immediately receives a number, type, priority and the basic data needed for further handling.

Ownership and deadlines

It is clear who owns the next step, what the deadline is and which cases are overdue.

Documentation and evidence

Photos, reports, notes and decisions are attached to the case instead of being scattered outside it.

Billing and closure

The team can see when the case is ready for billing and which conditions must be met before formal closure.

Example material

See one case from request to closure

The static demonstrator shows a board, service request details, decision history, documentation, closure conditions and a management view using fictional data.

It is an example material, not a live client application or a production-ready system.

View the service workflow demonstrator ➜

What can come next?

If the audit confirms that the change is justified, the next step can be a limited pilot of one workflow using real cases. The pilot should make it possible to measure the effect and decide whether to expand, improve or stop.

Technology is selected for the workflow

Depending on the need, a pilot may include a simple panel, automation, integration, OCR or controlled AI support.

Starting at PLN 18,000 net

The starting version may include a request register, a case card, statuses, deadlines and documentation.

The exact scope, timeline and price are agreed after the conversation.

Make one workflow decision

If you want to organise HVAC and renewable energy service operations, start with a conversation about one real workflow or with a short self-check in the scanner.